Cooling Tower Water Use: Cycles of Concentration Explained
Cooling Tower Water Use: Cycles of Concentration Explained
A cooling tower is a giant evaporator. Every kW of heat it rejects boils off about 1.2 kg of water. Multiply that by 6,000 operating hours and you get numbers most site managers do not want to see. The single biggest lever to reduce that water use — often by half — is cycles of concentration (COC). This guide covers the math and the practical limits.
1. The three components of makeup water
Makeup = Evaporation + Blowdown + Drift
Evaporation
A fixed function of the heat rejection duty. For open recirculating towers:
E (GPM) ≈ 0.001 × Recirc(GPM) × ΔT (°F)
The factor 0.001 assumes ~1,000 Btu/lb latent heat and water density near 8.34 lb/gal. It is remarkably consistent across tower brands and climates.
Blowdown
Evaporation removes pure water and leaves dissolved solids behind. Left unchecked, TDS climbs until scale forms. Blowdown deliberately dumps some concentrated water and refills with fresh:
B = E / (COC − 1)
Where COC = TDS_blowdown / TDS_makeup. At COC = 2, blowdown equals evaporation. At COC = 6, blowdown is only 20% of evaporation. That is the entire game.
Drift
Water droplets carried out with the exiting air. Modern drift eliminators achieve 0.001–0.005% of recirculating flow. Older towers can lose 0.1% — a real number in humidity-sensitive plants.
2. Why COC matters so much
Consider a 1,000 GPM tower with 10°F range operating 6,000 hr/yr:
| COC | Blowdown | Makeup | Annual water |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10.0 GPM | 20.2 GPM | 7.3 M gal |
| 4 | 3.3 GPM | 13.5 GPM | 4.9 M gal |
| 6 | 2.0 GPM | 12.2 GPM | 4.4 M gal |
| 8 | 1.4 GPM | 11.6 GPM | 4.2 M gal |
Moving from COC 2 to COC 4 saves 2.4 million gallons per year. Going further to COC 6 saves another 0.5 M — diminishing returns kick in fast.
3. The treatment limits you cannot ignore
COC is capped by whichever species will scale first:
- Calcium hardness — CaCO₃ scale forms above LSI ≈ +0.5.
- Silica — precipitates above ~150 ppm as SiO₂.
- Sulfate — CaSO₄ above ~1,500 ppm.
- Chloride — corrosion accelerates above ~500 ppm on carbon steel.
Calculate the ratio: max allowable / makeup concentration. The lowest ratio is your maximum COC. Push past it and you trade water savings for cleaning bills.
4. Getting to high COC
Most plants stuck at COC = 3 can safely reach COC = 5+ with modest changes:
- Softened makeup — remove hardness before it enters the tower.
- Acid feed — controls alkalinity, prevents CaCO₃.
- Side-stream filtration — removes suspended solids that concentrate.
- Real-time TDS/conductivity control — replaces timed blowdown, keeps COC near the limit.
Each of these has payback under 2 years at typical water and sewer rates.
5. Drift is often forgotten
Drift matters for two reasons: it is legionella-relevant, and old eliminators can hide massive water loss. If your tower predates 2000 and has no efficiency label, assume 0.05–0.1% drift and budget replacement. New eliminators are inexpensive and pay back through both water and chemical savings.
Run the numbers
Use the Cooling Tower Makeup Water Calculator to model your tower at different COC values, then check whether your makeup water chemistry allows it. For steam-side condensate recovery — the other high-ROI water lever — see the Condensate Return Calculator.
Related reads
- Boiler Feed Pump Sizing: A Practical Guide
How to size a boiler feed pump for real installations — flow, TDH, NPSH, and common mistakes.
- Darcy vs Hazen-Williams: A Practical Guide to Pipe Friction Loss
Why the Darcy–Weisbach equation should be your default, when Hazen–Williams still earns its keep, and how to add fittings without over-estimating losses.
- Steam Flow in Pipes: Velocity, Pressure Drop and Line Sizing
How to size steam mains — the velocity limits engineers actually use, why hot steam pipes drop pressure faster than you think, and the sanity checks every design should pass.
One short email a month. Free PDFs, worked examples, no spam.